"I'm not like other books"
Aug. 9th, 2023 11:39 pmYes, I'm still working through Lackey's Elemental Masters series.
One thing that deeply annoys me in this series (and which is probably responsible for why I never got into it the way I did the Valdemar books) is how heavily its brand of feminism relies on the "I'm not like other girls" trope of being dismissive of women who are not, in the character's opinion, sufficiently strong and independent. To the point of the main character in The Fire Rose literally thinking that unlike most women, SHE uses her brain.
Sarah and Nan are the worst offenders, possibly just because the middle of the series randomly became The Sarah and Nan Show before moving back to stand-alone stories in a shared magical universe. Sarah and Nan, who are portrayed as virtuously middle class in spite of the fact they're actually being supported by Lord Alderscroft so they can be "on call" when he needs their powers for investigations. All the benefits of being the idle rich, but they have to darn their own stockings rather than buy new ones, so they're allowed to still be good people.
I don't much like Sarah and Nan. Or rather, I don't much like the "people should help one another, except when we disapprove of the person needing help, and then she's a silly bint who should have known better and fuck her, learn to be self sufficient" behavior that's so common to them. (This is very specifically aimed at the opening of The Case of the Spellbound Child, which is completely unrelated to the rest of the book and either exists because Lackey needed to fluff her word count, or just so Nan and Sarah can be sanctimonious.)
So anyway, I have issues with these books, and the issues just expand as I grimly force myself through the series.
But as annoying as it is when characters are smugly superior about other characters who exist solely to give the mains something to be smugly superior about, it's a whole other level when you have your characters be smugly superior about how "silly" and "unrealistic" the popular novels of the time are, with the unspoken but clear message of "unlike the well-considered tome in your hands right now, Gentle Reader".
I mean, maybe it's a sign of self awareness, of Lackey knowing she doesn't have a leg to stand on when it comes to criticizing "horrid gothic romances" and "people who make up the most absurd idiocy out of whole cloth." But frankly, given the tone of this whole series, I'm more inclined to read it as the book proudly proclaiming "I'm not LIKE other books."
One thing that deeply annoys me in this series (and which is probably responsible for why I never got into it the way I did the Valdemar books) is how heavily its brand of feminism relies on the "I'm not like other girls" trope of being dismissive of women who are not, in the character's opinion, sufficiently strong and independent. To the point of the main character in The Fire Rose literally thinking that unlike most women, SHE uses her brain.
Sarah and Nan are the worst offenders, possibly just because the middle of the series randomly became The Sarah and Nan Show before moving back to stand-alone stories in a shared magical universe. Sarah and Nan, who are portrayed as virtuously middle class in spite of the fact they're actually being supported by Lord Alderscroft so they can be "on call" when he needs their powers for investigations. All the benefits of being the idle rich, but they have to darn their own stockings rather than buy new ones, so they're allowed to still be good people.
I don't much like Sarah and Nan. Or rather, I don't much like the "people should help one another, except when we disapprove of the person needing help, and then she's a silly bint who should have known better and fuck her, learn to be self sufficient" behavior that's so common to them. (This is very specifically aimed at the opening of The Case of the Spellbound Child, which is completely unrelated to the rest of the book and either exists because Lackey needed to fluff her word count, or just so Nan and Sarah can be sanctimonious.)
So anyway, I have issues with these books, and the issues just expand as I grimly force myself through the series.
But as annoying as it is when characters are smugly superior about other characters who exist solely to give the mains something to be smugly superior about, it's a whole other level when you have your characters be smugly superior about how "silly" and "unrealistic" the popular novels of the time are, with the unspoken but clear message of "unlike the well-considered tome in your hands right now, Gentle Reader".
I mean, maybe it's a sign of self awareness, of Lackey knowing she doesn't have a leg to stand on when it comes to criticizing "horrid gothic romances" and "people who make up the most absurd idiocy out of whole cloth." But frankly, given the tone of this whole series, I'm more inclined to read it as the book proudly proclaiming "I'm not LIKE other books."